<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wikidot="http://www.wikidot.com/rss-namespace">

	<channel>
		<title>EA based on other processes?</title>
		<link>http://agileea.wikidot.com/forum/t-3709/ea-based-on-other-processes</link>
		<description>Posts in the discussion thread &quot;EA based on other processes?&quot;</description>
				<copyright></copyright>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2026 01:24:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		
					<item>
				<guid>http://agileea.wikidot.com/forum/t-3709#post-8183</guid>
				<title>EA based on other processes?</title>
				<link>http://agileea.wikidot.com/forum/t-3709/ea-based-on-other-processes#post-8183</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 16:41:31 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>AgileEA</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>8054</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>Should we base Enterprise Architecture operational processes on the types of Roles, Artefacts, Disciplines we see in the software development processes?</p> <p>If we are to speed up the creation of an EA Process, it would be quicker to Extend the existing base processes, such as Change Management, Configuration management, Project planning, Environment disciplines and other RUP/OpenUP type categorizations in an EA context. What do you think?</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
				</channel>
</rss>